The real problem here is international law, which does not address acts of war committed by non-state actors out of uniform. Or more precisely, it does, but leaves them deliberately in a state of legal limbo, with captors left free to deal with them as they wish. If the international legal community does not like the latter, it is time they did the hard work of defining precisely how a nation deals with an act of war carried out under these circumstances.
Monday, November 23, 2009
The meaning of the 9-11 trials, by STRATFOR
The only work on the 9-11 trials you need to read is "Deciphering the Mohammed Trial" by George Friedman, 16 Nov 2009:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Stephen Green compares, properly, San Francisco's Planning Commission to the Red Guards : “In a 5–0 vote, it ordered Johnston to build a...
-
I’ll just update this post as the week goes by. David Cole of Takimag is a treasure of un-PC thought: Get the joke? Van Der Mark claim...
No comments:
Post a Comment