The real problem here is international law, which does not address acts of war committed by non-state actors out of uniform. Or more precisely, it does, but leaves them deliberately in a state of legal limbo, with captors left free to deal with them as they wish. If the international legal community does not like the latter, it is time they did the hard work of defining precisely how a nation deals with an act of war carried out under these circumstances.
Monday, November 23, 2009
The meaning of the 9-11 trials, by STRATFOR
The only work on the 9-11 trials you need to read is "Deciphering the Mohammed Trial" by George Friedman, 16 Nov 2009:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Modern Grotesque
Stephen Green compares, properly, San Francisco's Planning Commission to the Red Guards : “In a 5–0 vote, it ordered Johnston to build a...
-
I found a little more about the attrition rates at Dell's tech support. I spoke to one guy today who had twenty-nine people in his class...
-
A Conservative Teacher writes that teachers will try for a general strike in May. This is a little insane, but not too insane for the union...
No comments:
Post a Comment